Award-winning broadcast journalist and attorney Shawn Gillum obtained his juris doctor from the University of Denver Sturm College of Law. While working with Isaacson Rosenbaum PC in Colorado as an attorney, Shawn Gillum researched, authored, and argued a landmark case before the Colorado Supreme Court, published at Turbyne v. People, 151 P.3d 563 (Colo. 2007).
When stopped by police in Aurora, Colorado, in 2005, Glenn Turbyne requested a blood test rather than a breath test to determine his blood-alcohol level at the time. However, due to the poor weather conditions and a particularly busy night for paramedics, no qualified person could be found to do the blood draw within the required 2-hour time frame. A deputy then told Turbyne that he had to take a breath test or his license could be revoked for a full year, and the resulting test found his blood-alcohol level to be more than twice the legal limit. An Arapahoe County judge later dismissed the DUI charges on the grounds that bad weather was not an excuse for failing to comply with Turbyne’s request for a blood test. The charge was later reinstated by a district court judge, which Turbyne appealed.
In a 4-3 ruling, the Colorado Supreme Court upheld the DUI charge, but held that the breath test results must be thrown out. The court felt the deputy in question misstated the express consent law, coercing Turbyne into taking the breath test with threats. Colorado’s express consent law means that any individual operating a motor vehicle anywhere in the state of Colorado is consenting to take breath or blood tests to determine the blood-alcohol content of their blood. Before this case, law enforcement officers were required to give an advisement to drivers suspected of DUI or related offenses.